Re: Moving libusb to /lib (was: [Re: nut: final stage of shutdown doesn't work if /usr is a in separate filesystem])
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:14:40AM +0200, nb wrote:
> > According to the FHS [2], libusb should so be
> > installed in /lib. The other option is to compile
> > newhidups statically with libusb.
>
> First option is a good one !
>
> > There are pros and cons for both solution, but
> > I (as upstream and DD) am more for the first.
>
> I think so
>
> > Note that I've previously contacted libusb maintainer
> > (salut Aurelien) to talk with him about that.
>
> What does he say about this ?
I think that /lib is already bloated by a lot of libraries, but if it is
the right way (tm) to do that, I'll upload a new version soon (already
ready on my disk).
Could anybody else confirm that it is ok to do that?
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' aurel32@debian.org | aurelien@aurel32.net
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
Reply to: