Re: Please, not more font packages
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Please, not more font packages
- From: Roger Leigh <rleigh@whinlatter.ukfsn.org>
- Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:30:41 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87acvefmjy.fsf@whinlatter.whinlatter.ukfsn.org>
- In-reply-to: <4CE7375925%linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk> (Darren Salt's message of "Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:46:26 +0100")
- References: <ec7239528bc809d69d1bd8019a2f0104@ibook.linuks.mine.nu> <20040829153014.GA3933@glorybox.kl2.local> <20040830192921.GB6918@freenet.de> <4b0fe2bb04083014159f50088@mail.gmail.com> <874qmkdx3y.fsf@whinlatter.whinlatter.ukfsn.org> <4CE7375925%linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Darren Salt <linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk> writes:
> I demand that Roger Leigh may or may not have written...
>
>> Carlos Laviola <carlos.laviola@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:29:21 +0200, Michelle Konzack
>>> <linux4michelle@freenet.de> wrote:
>>>> Oh yes, does anyone know a fontcreator for the console-fonts ?
>>> $ apt-cache search console font
>>> cfe - Console Font Editor
>>> fonter - Interactive font editor for the console
>
>> But... are there any that can edit PSF fonts larger than 8x16 and/or allow
>> editing of the unimap/sfm?
>
> fonty-dev /may/ be of help - it contains psf2sbf and sbf2psf, which convert
> between PSF and plain-text source.
The SBF format looks like it can cope with arbitrarily-sized glyphs.
It also references the glyphs by their UCS id, and can handle
fallbacks. I'll take a closer look at it--it looks like it might be
quite useful.
Thanks for pointing it out!
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFBVYEPVcFcaSW/uEgRAm8MAKCr0O+DrHYJZ6J6w6jW716ptqYH7wCdG+nQ
L3Oz4DgbzxZTqYbFBKox4tg=
=Ih6q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: