Re: How should stalin be handled on slower architectures?
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 10:59:11PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The bug report isn't about whether the package *should* be built for
> m68k and arm, it's about whether it *can* be built for m68k and arm.
Why shouldn't it buildable? Just because it uses some little swap space and
outputs nothing to the build log, so it gets killed after reaching the
The first can be solved with throwing more swap space in, the latter with a
small task outputting a line of "I'm still compiling..." once in an hour or