Re: should udev be mandatory?
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 10:12:59AM +0100, David Pashley wrote:
> On Sep 14, 2004 at 23:00, Marco d'Itri praised the llamas by saying:
> > Unless it's fixed (and the author said repeatedly that it will not be),
> > it basically cannot work reliably unless most init scripts are
> > redesigned to become dev.d scripts.
> >
> > (Can somebody check what other distributions really do?)
> >
> Presumably this would need to include solving the software raid issue of
> mdadm/raidtools need /dev/md? device to configure the array, but the
> device not existing until the array has been configured. I've not been
> able to use udev on a box with md arrays[0].
I'm gonna add a /dev/mdctl to the md driver as soon as I get a little
time.
Reply to: