Re: PROPOSAL to serialize cron.{daily,weekly,monthly}
On 05-Sep-04, 14:23 (CDT), Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> There remains the question of what the default should be.
>
> Would serialized execution be significantly better for the vast
> majority of systems out there? If so then it might be worth
> implementing the idea.
On the vast majority of systems, it doesn't make any difference.
Evidence: This is the first time the topic has come up in ~8 years.
("This topic" meaning serialization of daily/weekly/monthly. There have
been various complaints about how long things take, and avoiding network
disks when doing 'find / ...', etc., but those problems would not be
affected by the proposal.)
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
world. -- seen on the net
Reply to:
- References:
- PROPOSAL to serialize cron.{daily,weekly,monthly}
- From: Abdullah Ramazanoglu <ar018@yahoo.com>
- Re: PROPOSAL to serialize cron.{daily,weekly,monthly}
- From: Steve Greenland <steveg@moregruel.net>
- Re: PROPOSAL to serialize cron.{daily,weekly,monthly}
- From: Carlos Sousa <csousa@tvtel.pt>
- Re: PROPOSAL to serialize cron.{daily,weekly,monthly}
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: PROPOSAL to serialize cron.{daily,weekly,monthly}
- From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>