Am 2004-08-26 23:27:10, schrieb Otavio Salvador:
> Other possibility and better, IMHO, is provide alternative Packages
> files but at first time all will be get and then only which had
> changes.
As I have written in an other messages before...
Better is, to make a TWO-Weekly Packages(.gz)
and then the next 13 days a daily patch...
But I think, Spliting up the Packages(.gz) is
only interesting for TESTING and UNSTABLE and
maybe security.d.o
> This can solve the dependencies problems and the processing time can
> be smaller since you can process only the changed packages file.
>
> What all thinks about?
And what do you think about my idea ?
Greetings
Michelle
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi
0033/3/88452356 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
Attachment:
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature