|| On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 22:00:30 -0500 || Adam Majer <adamm@galacticasoftware.com> wrote: am> Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Other possibility and better, IMHO, is provide alternative Packages >> files but at first time all will be get and then only which had >> changes. >> >> This can solve the dependencies problems and the processing time can >> be smaller since you can process only the changed packages file. >> >> What all thinks about? >> >> am> Just have Packages{,.gz,bz2} as we have now, plus files like am> Packages-2004-08-24.bz2 am> Packages-2004-08-23.bz2 am> Packages-2004-08-22.bz2 am> ... am> Packages-2004-08-14.bz2 am> Each one of these Package files would just be composed of a diff (not a am> literal `diff` :) between the prev. day's Packages and the next. Then am> apt would just keep track what date it downloaded last. am> The only problem that could arise is if the full Packages file is not up am> to sync (for example, a day old). To work around this, full Packages am> downloads should also download the latest Packages-`date -u -I`.bz2 am> files and use that package's date as a reference date. am> Since this feature would not be used by all people, but would be very am> handy for others, this should be implemented as an option turned off by am> default. am> Any opinions? Will reduze the download a lot bug the processing no since this will apply in Packages and then it need to be full reprocessed. -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house."
Attachment:
pgpobW79rj4aU.pgp
Description: PGP signature