Re: New package with old name
Good idea. I guess that this conflict should remove all problems. I
guess I'll do it after the freeze. And yes, I'll explore using an epoch
to avoid versioning problems.
Saludos,
Jesus.
On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 19:42, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona wrote:
> > Good!
> >
> > However, I'm a bit concerned with users of cil being surprised to find
> > that "cil" is a different thing... Anybody sees this as a problem? Is
> > there anything about this in Policy? (I looked for it, but didn't found
> > anything relevant).
>
> You could always declare a conflict with cil (<< older_version)
>
> Hmm, and since the version of cil is 200100227-3, you'd have to use an
> epoch or a similar version scheme for users to find their chess program
> automatically turned into some statistical foo.
>
> Regards,
>
> Joey
>
> --
> Have you ever noticed that "General Public Licence" contains the word "Pub"?
>
> Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
Contribute to keep Europe free of software patents!
EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es
-----
Jesus M. Gonzalez Barahona | Grupo de Sistemas y Comunicaciones
jgb@gsyc.escet.urjc.es / jgb@computer.org | ESCET, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
tel: +34 91 664 74 67 | c/ Tulipan s/n
fax: +34 91 488 70 49 | 28933 Mostoles, Spain
Reply to: