On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 10:47:09PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > This is a "should" not a "must". Additionally, I see nothing in policy > that indicates that the package should/must blindly remove all files in > a directory that it used to store some of it's files. A "should" is still a requirement. It's just not release-critical. The policy manual doesn't use should and must the same way that RFCs do. Richard Braakman