Re: Sarge: GCC 3.4 in Sid
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 03:47:34PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Bdale Garbee <email@example.com> [2004-08-02 11:24]:
> > > Honestly, I think we should freeze _Unstable_
> > Our current approach to release management came to be precisely
> > because the process of freezing unstable and trying to release it
> > was such a hideous mess, even when Debian was much smaller in scale.
> I don't think Eduard suggested freezing unstable and doing away with
> testing, but keeping the testing model and freeze testing plus
> unstable. If you only freeze testing, new packages can go into
> unstable and when you need to make a update to testing you have to use
> testing-proposed-updates rather than unstable (which leads to several
> problems, such a less testing).
I think this sounds like a interesting approach. Was this
discussed/tried before? If so, does anyone have pointers where I can
read about this?
The first rule of holes is: when you find yourself in one, stop digging. - PJ
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo