On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 08:59:19PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 01:36:10PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > > > Is there some more restrictive versioning and dependancy scheme I could > > use? I tried setting shlibs so that packages would depend on =version > > instead of >=version, but that seems to be a bit too restrictive. > > Nice folks in IRC suggested me to Provide: libtagcoll-api-1.0 and > Depend: libtagcoll-api-1.0, then change the virtual package depend when > the API/ABI changes. > > It's a solution that I like very much and I want to post it here for the > records. Unless I am misunderstanding what you mean this shouldn't be needed if you use libtool and its versioning system. Look into how its current, revision, age system works. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature