[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64



On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 03:33:17PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> You're jumping through a lot of hoops to get to somewhere which is a bit
> like multiarch, but not quite.  And you'll end up with something less
> capable, more ugly and a lot more work to support properly when
> upgrading to multiarch.  Doing the full dance is less work.

You don't know that.  Multiarch isn't designed yet.

[That's why some of my questions about "what's what" get answers like
"read these email discussions".]

> You're claiming, for some reason, that amd64 needs to prepare for
> multiarch migration in some other way than our 11 other architectures
> because you think that the amd64 porters should support solving problems
> for sarge a way none of the porters are willing to solve for sarge.

There's no need to get so excited about this.

I never claimed that those porters had to do that work.

-- 
Raul



Reply to: