* viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk (viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk) wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 04:30:45PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > a) release sarge with pure64/amd64 support > > - Good enough for most people > > - Can still run some 32bit apps using ia32-lib > > - Can run 32bit apps in a chroot > > b) release sarge with *no* amd64 support > > c) put amd64 in sid when mirror system is able to deal with that, if it > doesn't produce noticable amount of extra FTBFS - feed it into -testing > (after sarge goes out). If it does well in -testing, consider adding it > to point release later on. Sure, that's a possibility. A point release would be fine, but the impression I got from Raul was that he was against releasing it into stable at all as pure64. Certainly I see that as a reasonable compramise (and I think most of the rest of the amd64 folks would too). Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature