Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 08:13:09PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> I remember when I suggested that we should follow clause 1 of the Social
> Contract, this was pedantic for you too. Do you find adherance with official
> documents always pedantic or only when you disagree with them?
Uhm.. well. Let's calm down. Matthew expressed his concerns (on IRC) that
this insinuates he supports non-free in main.
I'll make it clear: This is only a silly discussion on pedantry. I didn't mean
to insinuate that Matthew supports non-free. There's actualy missing a lot of
context and the reference shouldn't be interpreted that way.
Sorry for the missunderstanding (well, my accusation of pedantry still stands
but I hope the flame is finished here ;)
"[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the
thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he
gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work."
-- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion)