Andreas Barth wrote:
* Matthew Palmer (firstname.lastname@example.org) [040624 05:55]:On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 09:15:43PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:* Chris Cheney (email@example.com) [040623 20:55]:They could just be removed from sarge and be released again with sarge+1... Not every package with a RC bug has to be fixed and released with sarge, it is common practice to pull them if they don't get fixed in time.You're not really suggesting to not release gnustep in sarge?That's what we do with packages that aren't of release quality.Do you really and honestly believe that this bug means that gnustep is not of release quality. In my opinion, these bugs are non-blockers for sarge, and one of the issues that should be fixed for sarge+1. Cheers, Andi
No package is an exception to debian policy except for maybe any of the old GFDL crap in coreutils. If they[the maintainers] don't want to meet debian standards these packages don't deserve to be in Debian.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature