On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 16:39, Robin wrote: > In the mean time, is there any other way that mcvs could make it into > testing? Has it ever been the case that a developer requested for an > architecture of his package to be removed from a distribution? I'm aware > that this would just be circumventing the real problem, but out of > curiosity I just have to ask. Yup, I had to do something similar. If you _really_ can't get the lisp stuff to build on mips, you can file a bug on ftp-master asking for the binaries of your package for mips to be removed from unstable. This will eliminate the "out-of-date-on-mips" excuse and it can then move into testing(barring other issues) -- Mike Furr <mfurr@debian.org> 1024D/124B26F3 5B9F 587F BC5C D823 50CE 4DB0 ED93 CA29 124B 26F3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part