On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:09:43AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > On Thu, 20 May 2004 22:09, Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> wrote: > > - valid sender addresses from domains without SPF enabled > > If spammers do that then it will provide a significant incentive for adding > SPF to all domains. Much like the significant incentive for rejecting all inbound mail. murphy receives a little more than twice as much spam than valid mail; if your argument held then we should simply pull the plug. You're ignoring the false positive rates. One false positive is much worse than one false negative. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature