Re: @debian.org email forwarding and SPF
On Thu, 20 May 2004 22:09, Andrew Suffield <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> - valid sender addresses from domains without SPF enabled
If spammers do that then it will provide a significant incentive for adding
SPF to all domains. If spammers use a random selection of From: addresses
then once we have domains covering half the Internet user-base with SPF
entries in their DNS the number of messages pretending to be from any given
non-SPF domain should be expected to double.
I use a moderate number of DNSBL services. Of the spam that gets past my
DNSBL's recently about half of it is bounces of spam that used one of my
email addresses. So if I didn't use SPF DNS entries and half the Internet
did then I would expect to have a 50% increase of spam. If 80% of the
Internet used the SPF DNS entries then once the spammers caught up I would
expect to see a 200% increase in spam if I didn't have them.
Even if I didn't like SPF I would be compelled to use it if more than 50% of
the email addresses were protected by it once the spammers caught up. As 50%
of the email addresses are probably run by a couple of dozen companies that
could easily happen in a short period of time (if it hasn't already).
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page