Re: Spam in the lists out of control
Marco d'Itri <email@example.com> wrote:
> On May 09, Santiago Vila <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Those who still do not see the need to make the lists closed for non
>> subscribers or non registered people (via the whitelist), please
>> propose a better solution.
> Start using DNSBLs like SBL, XBL and DSBL, or have Blars Blarson try on
> murphy the same recipes he uses to filter spam in the BTS.
At least XBL and DSBL have false positives.
From: Andreas Barth <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: incoming/katie monitoring
From: Bernd Eckenfels <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
NMUs aren't an insult, they're not an attack, and they're
not something to avoid or be ashamed of.
Anthony Towns in 2004-02 on debian-devel