Re: Spam in the lists out of control
Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it> wrote:
> On May 09, Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> wrote:
>> Those who still do not see the need to make the lists closed for non
>> subscribers or non registered people (via the whitelist), please
>> propose a better solution.
> Start using DNSBLs like SBL, XBL and DSBL, or have Blars Blarson try on
> murphy the same recipes he uses to filter spam in the BTS.
[...]
At least XBL and DSBL have false positives.
DSBL:
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: incoming/katie monitoring
Message-ID: <20040418153240.GA12258@mails.so.argh.org>
[...]
XBL
From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists@lina.inka.de>
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, 245825@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20040425180604.GA25292@lina.inka.de>
cu andreas
--
NMUs aren't an insult, they're not an attack, and they're
not something to avoid or be ashamed of.
Anthony Towns in 2004-02 on debian-devel
Reply to: