Goswin von Brederlow wrote: [GPL] > Thats clearly not DFSG free. > > And no, those files are not the license of the source they acomplish > but stand on their own. Well, you could add the GPL FAQ from fsf.org as a statement of the copyright holder. The restrictions included in that permission clause seem to be within the limits of DFSG3. Kind regards Thomas -- Thomas Viehmann, <http://thomas.viehmann.net/>
Attachment:
pgp9ePsC91Idh.pgp
Description: PGP signature