[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Mass bug filing: Cryptographic protection against modification

* Steve Langasek:

>> Wouldn't it be better to admit a mistake and cancel or correct it
>> then not to look too close at what one has done? 
>> It doesn't get any better by not looking.
>   We provide the guidelines that we use to determine if a work is "free" 
>   in the document entitled "The Debian Free Software Guidelines". We 
>   promise that the Debian system and all its components will be free 
>   according to these guidelines. We will support people who create or use 
>   both free and non-free works on Debian. We will never make the system 
>   require the use of a non-free component.
> So you are asserting that license texts are a "component of the Debian
> system", in contradiction to the claims of those who actually voted for
> this GR?

What is a "compoment of the Debian system"?  Is there any other
reasonable interpretation but "shipped as part of main"?

Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the
following domains: atlas.cz, bigpond.com, di-ve.com, hotmail.com,
jumpy.it, libero.it, netscape.net, postino.it, simplesnet.pt,
tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz, tiscali.it, voila.fr, yahoo.com.

Reply to: