Re: Mass bug filing: Cryptographic protection against modification
I wrote:
> The question should not arise: I see no way that a public key could be
> copyrightable.
Florian Weimer writes:
> Is it acceptable to ignore obnoxious but unenforceable license terms when
> evaluating licenses for DFSG compliance?
It's certainly legal. It's up to debian-legal to decide if it is
acceptable.
I assumed that the question was about keys distributed with no license at
all. In my IANAL opinion they need none as they are not copyrightable.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Reply to: