Re: Mass bug filing: Cryptographic protection against modification
> The question should not arise: I see no way that a public key could be
Florian Weimer writes:
> Is it acceptable to ignore obnoxious but unenforceable license terms when
> evaluating licenses for DFSG compliance?
It's certainly legal. It's up to debian-legal to decide if it is
I assumed that the question was about keys distributed with no license at
all. In my IANAL opinion they need none as they are not copyrightable.
firstname.lastname@example.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill