Re: Mass bug filing: Cryptographic protection against modification
* John Hasler:
> Matthias Urlichs writes:
>> I submit that we have far worse problems than quibbling about whether a
>> public key, as distributed under the DFSG, should be modifyable.
> The question should not arise: I see no way that a public key could be
Is it acceptable to ignore obnoxious but unenforceable license terms
when evaluating licenses for DFSG compliance?
Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the
following domains: atlas.cz, bigpond.com, di-ve.com, hotmail.com,
jumpy.it, libero.it, netscape.net, postino.it, simplesnet.pt,
tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz, tiscali.it, voila.fr, yahoo.com.