Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 09:41:59PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <email@example.com> writes:
> > Neither the CFVs nor http://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_003 provided a
> > meaningful account of the changes between the previous Social Contract and
> > the proposed one. This would have been very helpful to those of us who
> > don't read yet another mailing list, since weeks passed between the RFD mail
> > (March 24th) and the First Call for votes (April 11th).
> There's a problem with this: it's hard to get a totally objective
> summary of changes for many things you can vote on. It's not
> realistic to expect that the proponents write such a summary, and if
> the opponents are not organized, they can't speak with a single voice
How is that any different than what became the actual text of the GR?