Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:
> We have ,often, failed to follow the social contract in the
> past, though this was the first wilful violation I recall.
Non-communication of security bugs (and the supporting infrastructure)
is at the border of a SC violation, too.
The Social Contract has not just one clause, and might be necessary to
weigh one against the other (as we do with security bugs).
--
Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the
following domains: atlas.cz, bigpond.com, di-ve.com, netscape.net,
postino.it, tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz, tiscali.it, voila.fr.
Reply to: