[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#243129: NMU in DELAYED/3-DAY

Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi> writes:

> If this upload introduces bugs, upload a package fixing them. If it
> doesn't create any bugs, why complain? because someone thought they
> could you a bit? Bugs will appear eventually, or maybe a new 
> upstream version and you will  upload anyway later. Or if it 
> really bugs that much to have someone  NMU your package, just 
> upload the damn dummy package. 

I fully desagree with this behavior because :
 1) i find more respectful to give the maintainer some days to work on
 the problem as requested in the Developer's Manual
 2) this was a quick and BAD(tm) fix, probably (i'm working on this
 "probably") hiding a bigger problem. I really think a NMU must not be
 "instinctive" uploads.

> David isn't a DD either. And pride is a mayor problem. Please
> concentrate on having perfect packages rather than having a perfect
> track record.

"perfect packages" ? this remark is quite off-topic.
like if i was awaiting your advice...

Marc Dequènes (Duck)

Attachment: pgpIP65MsQt5g.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: