Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi> writes: > If this upload introduces bugs, upload a package fixing them. If it > doesn't create any bugs, why complain? because someone thought they > could you a bit? Bugs will appear eventually, or maybe a new > upstream version and you will upload anyway later. Or if it > really bugs that much to have someone NMU your package, just > upload the damn dummy package. I fully desagree with this behavior because : 1) i find more respectful to give the maintainer some days to work on the problem as requested in the Developer's Manual 2) this was a quick and BAD(tm) fix, probably (i'm working on this "probably") hiding a bigger problem. I really think a NMU must not be "instinctive" uploads. > David isn't a DD either. And pride is a mayor problem. Please > concentrate on having perfect packages rather than having a perfect > track record. "perfect packages" ? this remark is quite off-topic. like if i was awaiting your advice... -- Marc Dequènes (Duck)
Attachment:
pgpIP65MsQt5g.pgp
Description: PGP signature