Re: Bug#243129: NMU in DELAYED/3-DAY
Marc Dequènes (Duck) <Duck@DuckCorp.org> writes:
> Riku Voipio <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> If this upload introduces bugs, upload a package fixing them. If it
>> doesn't create any bugs, why complain? because someone thought they
>> could you a bit? Bugs will appear eventually, or maybe a new
>> upstream version and you will upload anyway later. Or if it
>> really bugs that much to have someone NMU your package, just
>> upload the damn dummy package.
> I fully desagree with this behavior because :
> 1) i find more respectful to give the maintainer some days to work on
> the problem as requested in the Developer's Manual
> 2) this was a quick and BAD(tm) fix, probably (i'm working on this
> "probably") hiding a bigger problem. I really think a NMU must not be
> "instinctive" uploads.
Oh, what's the big fucking deal? If you're not happy with the NMU, then
upload a better package than the one NMU'd. If you do it within three
days, no one will ever even see the NMU. That seems like it would be a
lot more productive than these NMU bitchfests.
You win again, gravity!