[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#243129: NMU in DELAYED/3-DAY

Marc Dequènes (Duck) <Duck@DuckCorp.org> writes:

> Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi> writes:
>> If this upload introduces bugs, upload a package fixing them. If it
>> doesn't create any bugs, why complain? because someone thought they
>> could you a bit? Bugs will appear eventually, or maybe a new 
>> upstream version and you will  upload anyway later. Or if it 
>> really bugs that much to have someone  NMU your package, just 
>> upload the damn dummy package. 
> I fully desagree with this behavior because :
>  1) i find more respectful to give the maintainer some days to work on
>  the problem as requested in the Developer's Manual
>  2) this was a quick and BAD(tm) fix, probably (i'm working on this
>  "probably") hiding a bigger problem. I really think a NMU must not be
>  "instinctive" uploads.

Oh, what's the big fucking deal?  If you're not happy with the NMU, then
upload a better package than the one NMU'd.  If you do it within three
days, no one will ever even see the NMU.  That seems like it would be a
lot more productive than these NMU bitchfests.

You win again, gravity!

Reply to: