On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 01:39:19AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > IMO, we should neither try to take a strong position on these
> > politically explosive issues, nor should we try to walk on eggshells.
> > I think we should take a similar approach as we do to package
> > management. If we have developer(s) willing to vouch for legitimacy of
> > a locale, and willing to maintain support for it, we should include it.
>
> Nothing in this discussion (which I asked not be crossposed to three
> mailing lists) has anything to do with what zh_* locales are included in
> d-i.
I was using "locale" in its mundane, not technical (locale(7)) sense.
Locale \Lo`cale"\, n. [F. local.]
1. A place, spot, or location.
[1913 Webster]
Sorry for the confusion.
--
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux | Ab abusu ad usum non valet
branden@debian.org | consequentia.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature