Re: Renaming GNUstep packages
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 03:01:12AM -0400, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> >>>>> "BN" == Brian Nelson <email@example.com> writes:
> Me> In my opinion, the Right Thing here is following the de facto
> Me> standard for application packages: using the upstream
> Me> software's name as the package name.
> BN> Whoever said that using the upstream name was a "de facto
> BN> standard?"
> Nobody said it. That's what makes it "de facto".
As several have said, heretofore the two goals have not been in
conflict, because the other upstream's names were not as generic as
this. Had they been, they too would have to prefix their package names
in some way.