Re: Renaming GNUstep packages
Evan Prodromou <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I mostly just like doing the Right Thing. In my opinion, the Right
> Thing here is following the de facto standard for application
> packages: using the upstream software's name as the package
> name. Other GNUstep application packages don't deviate from this.
Whoever said that using the upstream name was a "de facto standard?"
It's safe to say we often use the upstream name when it isn't
brain-damaged, but that's by no means standard practice.
You win again, gravity!