Re: udev device naming policy concerns
On Apr 03, Theodore Ts'o <email@example.com> wrote:
> As I've already said, Debian Policy requires the FHS, and quoting from
I do not consider this a major argument as modern FHS releases do not
mandate following devices.txt anymore.
> Hence, the flat namespace is already mandated by Debian Policy. And
> for good reason, as you point out:
> > Too many packages will depend on the location of some device files,
> > as was mentioned previously in this discussion.
But all packages should support devfs-like names as well (and most do).
Marco | [5539 infE4whlQmxTk]