On Thursday 01 April 2004 04.44, Steve Langasek wrote: > Perhaps this is just a technicality, but is it appropriate to raise the > severity of these bugs while gcc-3.2 is still present in the archive? As the stated goal of Matthias is to get g..-3.2 removed from sarge, I'd say yes. Better to raise severity now than to just break the packages and later discover that g..-3.2 shouldn't have been removed because one of the packages has serious build problems with newer compilers. As far as I understand Matthias, he would not object too strongly to the 3.2 packages left in if build problems are non-trivial to solve. Just my €.02, of course -- vbi -- Will the information superhighway have any rest stops?
Attachment:
pgpwaEwELfKtu.pgp
Description: signature