Re: [RFC] User Accesable Filesystem Hierarchy Standard

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] User Accesable Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:11:33 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040328081133.GA13712@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1080429109.2943.12.camel@m222.net81-64-248.noos.fr>
References: <[🔎] 200403271734.14687.greeneg@student.gvsu.edu> <[🔎] 1080429109.2943.12.camel@m222.net81-64-248.noos.fr>

* Nicolas Mailhot (Nicolas.Mailhot@laPoste.net) [040327 23:25]:
> From a usability POW hidden files (and directories) are very bad.

I disagree with you, if it's about directories normally not directly
used, but e.g. searched as a part of the path. I really prefer if I
don't normally see them with e.g. ls. (Well, I _have_ ~/.bin on my
systems for more than 5 years now.)


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to:

References:
- [RFC] User Accesable Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
  - From: Gary L Greene Jr <greeneg@student.gvsu.edu>
- Re: [RFC] User Accesable Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
  - From: Nicolas Mailhot <Nicolas.Mailhot@laPoste.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Base system installation size
Next by Date: Re: XFree86 4.3.0 and testing (was: when will the release release)
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] User Accesable Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] User Accesable Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread