Re: [adam@flounder.net: Re: testing and no release schedule]
Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
> Graham Wilson wrote:
[...]
>> Just because you don't use a particular platform doesn't mean that it is
>> not useful. Just because most users use an i386 variant doesn't mean
>> other architectures aren't useful.
> But, contrarily, just because they're useful doesn't mean i386 should be
> delayed for them. :-P
My gut feeling is that our release frame would not change if we only
had 5 archs instead of 11 to support.
cu andreas
--
NMUs aren't an insult, they're not an attack, and they're
not something to avoid or be ashamed of.
Anthony Towns in 2004-02 on debian-devel
Reply to: