[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [adam@flounder.net: Re: testing and no release schedule]

Graham Wilson wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 08:07:10PM +0000, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>> > Nope.  Red Hat 9 - i386 only
>> > 
>> >        Fedora - i386/ia64
>> > 
>> >        SuSE 9.1 i386/ia64/AMD ??
>> > 
>> > See any Alpha / SPARC / m68k ??
>> No, and I could care less about them.  If our releases are being delayed
>> because we're spending too much time supporting dead platforms, we should
>> drop support for them in our releases, or at least support them as
>> secondary platforms which are released after the primary platforms.
> Just because you don't use a particular platform doesn't mean that it is
> not useful. Just because most users use an i386 variant doesn't mean
> other architectures aren't useful.

But, contrarily, just because they're useful doesn't mean i386 should be
delayed for them.  :-P

Make sure your vote will count.

Reply to: