Re: [adam@flounder.net: Re: testing and no release schedule]
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 02:35:18PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 08:07:10PM +0000, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > Nope. Red Hat 9 - i386 only
> > >
> > > Fedora - i386/ia64
> > >
> > > SuSE 9.1 i386/ia64/AMD ??
> > >
> > > See any Alpha / SPARC / m68k ??
> >
> > No, and I could care less about them. If our releases are being delayed
> > because we're spending too much time supporting dead platforms, we should
> > drop support for them in our releases, or at least support them as secondary
> > platforms which are released after the primary platforms.
>
> Just because you don't use a particular platform doesn't mean that it is
> not useful. Just because most users use an i386 variant doesn't mean
> other architectures aren't useful.
These are my personal feelings which were in a private message and I will not
discuss them on the list as they aren't relevant to any ongoing discussion.
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna <adam@debian.org> <adam@flounder.net>
Reply to: