Re: Binary-only firmware covered by the GPL?
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 07:21:14PM -0500, Evan Prodromou wrote:
>...
> Also, there doesn't seem to be any obligation* on the part of the
> licensor to provide source in any particularly readable or
> maintainable format. Creators of Modified Versions might be under some
> such obligation, but I'm not sure the original author is.
WTF does the header state a file is under the GPL when all it contains
is a binary blob without available source code?
> ~ESP
>
> * Legal, not moral.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Reply to: