Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
Number Six <40311.nospam@comcast.net> wrote:
> So, again, as I said in the '/etc/friendlynames' thread, you therefore
> conclude that ImageMagick's 'display' and GNUSteps 'viewpdf' are
> following a bad practice. We have to live with it because they are
> 800-lb, 800-year old gorillas, but small fry need not expect the same
> kind of treatment.
Yes, these program names suck.
[ The "GNUstep" directory in my home directory also sucks. Why does this
project seem to think it can pollute every kind of namespace like
this? ]
--
Florent
Reply to: