Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:46:33AM +0100, Paul Seelig wrote:
> Naming GNUstep applications the generic way they are currently named
> strikes me as very elegant and aesthetically pleasing. This definitely
> fits the GNUstep approach and shouldn't be subsequently uglified for
> and by Debian maintainers.
>
> So don't even try fixing what is not even remotely broken.
Does that mean that only one project is allowed to be elegant and
aesthetically pleasing? This seems unfortunate.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: