Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 09:35:59AM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > Your argument about "generic names imply canonicality" can be equally
> > applied to the other two types of entities.
>
> Not necessarily. For instance, renaming binaries may or may not cause
> breakages with other apps/scripts that expect them to be named the same
> as upstream. Renaming packages generally does not lead to such dangers.
That's what Debian patches are for.
So, are viewpdf, terminal, camera, imageviewer, textedit, preferences,
addressmanager, addressview-frameowrk, apps-wrappers,
netclasses-framework, going to be renamed or what?
They should be renamed.
Reply to: