Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 08:22:39AM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
> FWIW, I'm talking about package names here - not binaries (I can't
> vouch for what anyone else might be talking about though).
> Is this perhaps meant in response to someone else's mail? I fail to see
> how this fits in with what I was saying at all.
Yes, if you are only talking about package names, then it has nothing to
do with you. However the other parts of the thread also discussed
generic binaries and generic aliases. You're being puckish, though.
Your argument about "generic names imply canonicality" can be equally
applied to the other two types of entities.