[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp



On Mar 25, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:

> If it's so trivial what was the reason that sendmail had to split it
> into a separate package?
People using bang paths need a real rmail command, and I suppose that
for large sites there are good reasons for using something more compact
than bash to process each incoming email.

-- 
ciao, |
Marco | [5333 taddSTa2huaHc]



Reply to: