Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> But what about my original point -- are others also annoyed by this
> namespace pollution? Is there any reason not to fix it?
You mean to use "pdfviewer" instead of "gnustep-pdfviewer"? I'm annoyed
by this, yes, at least if it is true that this application cannot be
used without gnustep. If it's just an alternative to xpdf, well, then
the name is kind of silly, but o.k.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Reply to: