Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
From: Ben Burton <bab@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:07:51 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040324130751.A8927@digican.ms.unimelb.edu.au>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] buoy8prdonz.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>; from miles@lsi.nec.co.jp on Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:22:40AM +0900
References: <[🔎] buohdwhwu7f.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> <[🔎] 871xnlfdtw.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch> <[🔎] m3zna78yyc.fsf@dionysos.attique.in> <[🔎] 87k71b8wgp.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch> <[🔎] buoy8prdonz.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>

> But what about my original point -- are others also annoyed by this
> namespace pollution?

I am also, FWIW.

b.

Reply to:

References:
- more overly-generic package names from gnustep
  - From: Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp>
- Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
- Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
  - From: Mathieu Roy <yeupou@coleumes.org>
- Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
- Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
  - From: Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp>

Prev by Date: kernel 2.6 packages cleanup
Next by Date: Re: kernel 2.4 packages cleanup
Previous by thread: Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
Next by thread: Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread