Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
* Miles Bader (miles@lsi.nec.co.jp) [040324 02:25]:
> Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> writes:
> > >>> I see there's some new gnustep packages with overly-generic names.
> > >>>
> > >>> Is there a reason why these aren't all prefixed with `gnustep-' or `gs-'
> > >>> or something?
> > But gs *is* in use as a prefix for gs-related packages:
> ...
> > I'd recommend not to use this.
> But what about my original point -- are others also annoyed by this
> namespace pollution? Is there any reason not to fix it?
You mean: About useing gs for gnustep? Yes, I'm also annoyed about this.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: