Re: Raising severity of Contains /usr/share/info/dir.gz if rebuilt on current sid"-bugs.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 02:44:12PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:59:04AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I'd say: just go ahead. It's definitly required that a package is
> > recompilable.
> Uh, no, strictly speaking it's not. We're getting closer to achieving
> that, but we haven't achieved it yet. Our (re)buildability requirements
> are still relatively limited.
Does that mean that FTBFS bugs found by a pbuilder run should not
be considered release-critical?
Matt Kraai email@example.com http://ftbfs.org/