On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:59:04AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Andreas Metzler (ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org) [040317 11:10]:
> > I.e. any of these package has a RC bug if it is recompieled without
> > fixing this bug. Today an NMU happened (anubis) which did exactly
> > this. To stop this from happening again I want to raise the severity
> > to serious, but not without asking here, I have CCed release but want
> > discussion to happen on -devel.
> I'd say: just go ahead. It's definitly required that a package is
> recompilable.
Uh, no, strictly speaking it's not. We're getting closer to achieving
that, but we haven't achieved it yet. Our (re)buildability requirements
are still relatively limited.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could.
http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature