On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:35:24PM +0100, Julian Mehnle wrote: > > Come on. You're trying to fix a problem we don't really have. Please: > > If it is not broken, than don't fix it. > I'm just not one of these conservatives who fix real problems not > until massive damage has already been caused. I'm clearly seeing a big > potential problem here, and I'm suggesting a solution *before* > significant damage has been caused. I agree with Julian. That's pretty obvious that prevention is much better resolution than fixing damages. Yep, now it's *one* event, but we can't be sure what will happened next. I'm not a DD yet, but what are the benefits of allowing someone untrusted to close BTS's bugs? We are not talking about restriction for sending comments, patches and so on. But closing bugs should be allowed for DD's and probably for persone who opened such bug. regards fEnIo -- _ Bartosz Feński aka fEnIo | mailto:fenio@o2.pl | pgp:0x13fefc40 _|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Głowackiego 3/15 - w. małopolskie - Polska (0 0) phone:+48602383548 | ICQ:46704720 | GG:726362 | IRC:fEnIo ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:fenio@jabber.org | RLU:172001
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature