[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: *UNAPPROVED* dpkg nmu



On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:39, "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <jaldhar@debian.org> wrote:
> Adam is a major stakeholder in arguably the most important package
> in Debian.  At a time when communication seems to be a major problem all
> over Debian, I wouldn't consider the use of even $600 to be a waste of
> money.  IMO of course.

Maybe we should do a "matching funds" scheme for such things?

If we find Debian developers who agree with you strongly enough to contribute 
$300 then using Debian funds for the other $300 sounds reasonable to me.

Then we just have to find people willing to provide free accomodation for 
DD's.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page



Reply to: