Re: *UNAPPROVED* dpkg nmu
* Adam Heath <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2004-02-28 17:39]:
> > I'd like to see it posted to the -dpkg list for public discussion,
> > but first Wichert has to post his summary. I asked him in private
> > mail to do so, but it has not happened yet. Once Wichert forwards
> > his message, Scott will post the summary from the meeting.
> What's with all the private talk? You keep making my point.
> For those not following, this is your DPL suggesting to keep things
For those not following, please actually read what I wrote. "I'd like
to see it posted to the -dpkg list for public discussion". However,
since Wichert mailed it to me in private instead of posting it to
-dpkg, I'd like him to post it (But there's nothing really secret
about it; he sent it to me to discuss at the conference; I printed it
and gave copies to everyone; but I feel it's a matter of etiquette to
let Wichert post his thoughts himself).
Also, please note that I arranged a meeting to discuss the status of
dpkg. You seem to want dpkg's status quiet.